Irem Kurt vs Anastasia Mozgaleva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 10:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Kurt vs A. Mozgaleva

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kurt 1 - 0 Mozgaleva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Irem Kurt winning 2 and Anastasia Mozgaleva winning 0. The last match between Irem Kurt and Anastasia Mozgaleva was at the W35 Istanbul, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Irem Kurt getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kurt | 1 |
| Mozgaleva | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Istanbul(10-28-25)
I. Kurt vs A. Mozgaleva H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 42.42% (28-38) | Career Total W/L | 37.08% (99-168) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Kurt vs A. Mozgaleva Match Preview:
- In the past 6 months, Irem Kurt has slightly outperformed Anastasia Mozgaleva in second serve points won, with 33.63% compared to Mozgaleva's 33.14%.
- How do they fare in return statistics? Irem Kurt again takes the edge, winning 51.17% of her opponent's second serve points, while Mozgaleva stands at 50.29%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Kurt's advantage persists with a rate of 34.37%, surpassing Mozgaleva's 32.45%.
- In critical moments, such as breakpoint situations, Kurt demonstrates stronger resilience, saving 50.00% of breakpoints compared to Mozgaleva's 41.94%.
- Looking at overall performance over the last year, Kurt has a superior win rate at 48.39%, whereas Mozgaleva has won only 36.84% of her matches.
- Both players have distinct best surfaces: Mozgaleva excels more on clay, whereas Kurt prefers hard courts.
- At the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Kurt has a better winning percentage, standing at 51.72%, compared to Mozgaleva's 34.09%.
- When considering opponent quality over the past year, Mozgaleva has played against slightly higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 235.96 versus Kurt's 277.32.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Mozgaleva is marginally more successful, securing victory in 45% of such sets versus Kurt's 40%.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their recent performances, Irem Kurt holds a slim advantage in several key areas. Her slight edge in second serve points and both first and second serve returns hints at more proficient play in pivotal game stages.
Kurt’s defensive skills are evident with her superior breakpoint saving rate, complementing her overall higher win rate in the past year across similar level tournaments.
Although Anastasia Mozgaleva has faced tougher opponents and shows promise in deciding sets, Kurt's consistency across various statistics solidifies her position as the probable favorite for the upcoming match.
With these factors in mind, Irem Kurt is slightly favored to triumph in this matchup.
Irem Kurt vs Anastasia Mozgaleva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Kurt vs A. Mozgaleva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:22:11 | Average Match Time | 1:22:11 |
| 61% (28/46) | 1st Serve % | 75% (38/51) |
| 82% (23/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (21/38) |
| 39% (7/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (25/51) | Return Points Win % | 35% (16/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Kurt Recent Matches Played
A. Mozgaleva Recent Matches Played

I. Kurt vs A. Mozgaleva Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.42% (28/38) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.08% (99/168) |
| 42.14% (59/81) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.91% (228/358) |
| 47.11% (595/668) | Games Win/Loss | 44.89% (2358/2895) |
| 57.14% (12/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.38% (22/42) |
| 34.88% (15/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.74% (74/117) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 57 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 141 | Total Double Faults | 248 |
| 1:4:43 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 235.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 209.51 |
| 61% (1684/2769) | 1st Serve % | 66% (4204/6363) |
| 57% (964/1684) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (2130/4204) |
| 40% (434/1085) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (877/2159) |
| 45% (159/351) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (331/728) |
| 45% (1283/2830) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2735/6219) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 45.00% (27/33) | Futures W/L | 37.39% (89/149) |
| 42% (27/65) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (98/266) |
| 22% (2/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (12/27) |
| 56% (5/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (22/53) |
| 96% (27/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (108/89) |
| 4% (27/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (108/19) |
| 5% (39/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (159/10) |